Qatari University Cancels Mashrou-Leila Lecture Amid Anti-LGBT+ Backlash

Outspoken indie rock band Mashrou’Leila has found itself at the center of controversy again after the cancellation of the lecture they were scheduled to give on “media revolutions in the Middle East” at North-Western University in Qatar on February 4, 2020. 

One of the most popular bands to come out of the Arab world, the group’s sustained brilliance has earned them a dedicated international following over the last decade. Rolling Stone Magazine describes Mashrou’Leila’s music as “funky, violin-adorned, socially-engaged indie rock.”However, due to their stance on social issues and the unapologetic outspokenness of the band’s openly gay singer, Hamed Sinno, the group has regularly found itself at the center of fierce controversy in the MENA region. 

Calls to cancel the band’s speaking engagement in Qatar began on Twitter with the hashtag #We reject the Mashrou’Leila lecture. 

Twitter users argued the Mashrou’Leila lecture would violate key tenets of Qatar’s conservative Islamic society. Homosexual conduct is illegal in Qatar, and, in November 2019, UN Experts reported several cases of individuals detained for same-sex relations.

In response to the backlash on social media, North-Western University in Qatar announced, in agreement with the prominent band, to move the talk to their Evanston, Illinois campus. A new date is yet to be announced. 

In a statement to Reuters, Northwestern’s Director of Media Relations Jon Yates said, “The decision to relocate was made out of an abundance of caution due to several factors, including safety concerns for the band and our community.”

He added: “We hope that event will facilitate a larger discussion. . . about aspects of civil liberties and freedom of expression that are not always open to such discussion in all parts of the world.” 

Qatar is the latest country in the Arabic world to push back against Mashrou’Leila. The progressive band’s stance on freedom of speech, gender equality, sectarianism, and gay rights has led to a conservative outcry across the Middle East and North Africa. Despite this, they maintain a huge fanbase, performing to packed stadiums and regularly releasing new music to widespread acclaim. 

Mashrou’Leila was banned from performing in Egypt, and a number of fans were jailed in a crackdown on minorities following a concert to a crowd of 35 000 at a  Cairo festival in 2017. Jordan barred the group in 2016 and 2017. 

Mashrou’Leila’s appearance at Byblos Festival in Lebanon was also canned in July last year due to threats against the band. Organizers pointed to menacing social media posts and pressure from homophobic members of influential Christian groups, saying that they felt they had to  cancel the event “to prevent bloodshed and preserve security.” 

In the 12 years since the band formed at the American University of Beirut, they have played numerous concerts in their home nation without incident. Lebanon has long been considered a haven of freedom in the Arab world and the cancellation was decried by human rights activists, prompting protests.

In an interview with GQ Middle East, band-member Firas Fakher said, “It’s not a coincidence that it happened at a time of huge economic problems and fears being stoked”. 

Commentators agree, with many pointing to the cancellation as indicative of a worrying regression of tolerance, and individual freedoms enjoyed by citizens of the country plagued by economic and political troubles. 

Meanwhile, discussion around Mashrou’ Leila’s Qatar visit has also raised the issue of the freedom and safety of LGBT+ football fans planning to travel to the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022. 

Immediately after Qatar won the hosting rights for the World Cup in 2010, former-FIFA President Sepp Blatter’s advice to LGBT+ supporters to “refrain from any sexual activities” while in Qatar, raised eyebrows. It also appeared contradictory to FIFA’s Human Rights Policy, which strictly prohibits discrimination of any kind. 

FIFA also requires that countries bidding to host the World Cup demonstrate “respect for human rights.” The organization, which prides itself on being  committed to social inclusiveness, has long said it espouses a policy of “promotion of diversity and zero tolerance for discrimination.” 

Qatar has until now played along, promising to abide by FIFA regulations and actively engaged with concerned supporters. However, the recent outcry over Mahrou’Leila’s planned lecture in Qatar flies in the face of the Gulf state’s recent efforts to reassure LGBT+ football fans they will be safe and welcome. 

In the past few months, Qatar has sought to ally supporters’ safety fears and human rights concerns. Qatari officials have met with fans of English football club Liverpool FC, including gay supporters club, the Kop Outs. 

Kop Outs founder Paul Amman and his husband were subsequently invited on a fact-finding visit to Qatar in November 2019. After the trip, Amman told AFP, “I’m very satisfied that their approach is to provide an ‘everyone is welcome’ ethos that does include respect, albeit through privacy.” 

Amman continued, “I’m not sure if rainbow flags generally will ever be accepted ‘in-country’, but maybe in stadia.” 

In an additional statement on the Kop Outs Facebook page, Amman reiterated that Qatar is a very private country. He echoed chief executive of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Nasser al-Khater’s advice: avoiding public displays of affection would enable gay fans to remain unidentifiable and peacefully enjoy the World Cup. 

In September, al-Khater emphatically proclaimed that all football fans would be safe in Qatar, regardless of their religious affiliation or sexual orientation. “I would like to assure any fan, of any gender, (sexual) orientation, religion, race (should) rest assured that Qatar is one of the safest countries in the world – and they’ll all be welcome here,” the Qatari official said.

He went on to explain that the Gulf country is making considerable efforts to ensure the safety of fans who will be traveling to the country to enjoy football’s most celebrated showpiece. “There’s a lot of training going into security personnel to make sure that things that are culturally different are seen in that frame,” said al-Khater.

For his part, Kop Outs’s Paul Amman agreed. “Qatar has moved significantly in recent years. . . I do not feel this has moved enough yet, but there is still progress being made,” concluded his statement after the fact-finding trip to the Gulf country.

“Football and its fans have (sic) a power to help change things for the better in Qatar for migrant workers, for LGBT+ people, and for our experience and safety at tournaments,” Amman also said. 

But for all the talk about considerable efforts being made and changes gradually happening, the social media furor surrounding  Mashrou’Leila’s talk shows a gulf remains between every-day citizens’ and Qatari authorities’ outward attitudes to LGBT+ rights. 

It remains to be seen how the LGBT+ community will be accommodated at the World Cup 2022. Like Russia, Qatar may surprise fans with its acceptance of gay visitors, but rights and conditions for the local LGBT+ community are unlikely to change.

Read also: Saudi Arabia Uses Influencers, International Stars To Expand Public Diplomacy

Can Oman’s New Sultan Haitham bin Tariq Tackle Rising Youth Unemployment?

Of some 80 suspected eligible candidates for the throne, the late Sultan put Haitham’s name forward in a secret letter opened after his death. State media reported the Royal Family Council respected Qaboos’ “wise counsel,” ensuring a seamless and rapid transfer of power. Regional commentators praised Haitham’s speedy ascent to the throne.

US credit rating agency Standard and Poor’s (S&P) said the move reduced “potential risks and regional interventions” in Oman’s affairs. S&P were also encouraged by the smooth transfer of power and Sultan’s confirmation he would follow his predecessors’ political approach.

Haitham’s first duty as ruler was to eulogize his uncle, after being sworn in on January 11, 2020. The Sultan used the speech to outline his intention to uphold Qaboos’ foreign policy legacy, commitment to sustainable development, and pursuit of economic diversification.

“We shall trace the course of the late Sultan, reaffirming the fundamentals of our country’s foreign policy based on peaceful co-existence with nations, good neighborliness, non- interference in the internal affairs of others, respect for countries’ sovereignty and international cooperation in various spheres,” the new Sultan proclaimed.

Whilst, Sultan Haitham’s intentions to continue his predecessor’s foreign policy legacy and development are clear, little is known about him as a person. The scant information available reveals he is cultured, diplomatic, and may possess the economic aptitude to tackle mounting financial and economic challenges that have turned Oman’s S&P credit rating to ‘junk’ status.

Before ascending to the sultanate, Oxford-educated Haitham served as the minister of heritage and culture from 2002. A career diplomat, Haitham also held several positions in the ministry of foreign affairs from 1986-2002. He is also known to have occasionally chaired cabinet meetings.

Sultan Haitham has no military background. This is a key differentiating feature from his brothers Assad and Shihab, who were also considered strong candidates for the role. However, he is reported to enjoy support amongst the intelligence service, Palace Office and nation’s merchant elite.

An English education, strong ties to the Royal Family and former role as head of the Anglo- Omani society mean he is also well regarded by the United Kingdom, an essential military and political partner.

In a Washington Institute article speculating on Oman’s succession, Gulf specialist Simon Henderson described Haitham as “quieter and less assertive [than half-brother Assad], with a much greater interest in business affairs.”

Henderson added: “He is believed to want the position of sultan,” and now he has it.

Economic Leadership

Haitham’s economic credentials appear to have set him apart from the other prime candidates. He has headed the Oman Vision 2040 committee, the body responsible for the nation’s economic and social development strategy, since 2013. Furthermore, he has personally invested in media, advertising, telecommunications, tourism, energy services, and construction, according to a 2009 leaked cable from the US Embassy in Muscat.

However, Sultan Haitham’s involvement in the failed $18 billion dollars Blue City mixed-use development project casts a shadow over his business acumen and judgment. Blue City required a bond bailout from Oman’s sovereign wealth fund, Oryx Investments in 2012 when it went bankrupt.

The new sultan held a 50 percent stake in the company controlling the project and, although, more generous analyses blamed the failure on unsuitable business associates, the disastrous ventures still seriously tarnished Haitham’s reputation.

Exeter University’s Oman expert Mark Valeri is doubtful about Vision 2040 and Haitham’s ability to deliver. “Given this track record and Haitham’s personal history in business, there are reasons to take a circumspect approach towards the Vision 2040 plans, especially since a further structural issue lies in the number of political decision-makers holding business interests,” said Valeri.

Other structural economic issues for Oman include over-reliance on oil revenue, youth unemployment, and high government debt. The new Sultan must draw on all his previous experience to help the transition from oil-reliance to a more diversified economy while avoiding measures that deepen its already sky-high debt and youth unemployment.

Oman’s budget deficit stood at 17 percent of GDP in 2015 but is expected to rise to a whopping 61 percent of GDP in 2020, according to the International Monetary Fund’s figures. Oman also holds the unenviable distinction of having the highest youth unemployment rate in the Gulf, with 49 percent of 15-24 year olds out of work, the World Bank reports.

The Vision 2040 plan identifies four pillars to ensure sustainable development: creating wealth through economic diversification and private sector partnership, ensuring balanced governorates development, preserving environment sustainability and building world-class infrastructure and livable cities. The strategy, however, fails to address the need for more equitable wealth distribution between social classes, and these neo-liberal reforms are likely to deepen the concentration of wealth and power amongst the merchant elite, leaving many young Omani’s disenfranchised.

Ruling Style

Qaboos was seen as personally responsible for the outsized role Oman played in regional diplomacy and its internal development. Commentators almost unanimously agree Haitham has big shoes to fill on the international stage, and it remains to be seen whether he will emulate his predecessor by taking such a definitive role in internal and international affairs.

Like Qaboos, Haitham may choose to retain absolute decision making power and an active role in the day-to-day running of Oman. However, according to Gregory Gause, head of the International Affairs Department at Texas A&M University’s Bush School of Government and Public Service, he is just as likely to take the lead of his Gulf counterparts.

“The question is whether he becomes more like the Emir of Kuwait – the ultimate decision- maker but leaving the day-to-day to others, or more like Mohammed bin Zayed [Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan] and [Saudi Arabia Crown Prince] Mohammed bin Salman – the clear and undisputed day-to-day decision-maker” said Gause.

Sultan Haitham bin Tariq Al Said faces many challenges. Observers can now only watch and wait to see how he will respond to the challenge of replacing his maverick uncle, and if he can maintain Oman’s trademark independent foreign policy in the face of mounting pressure from neighboring states and serious hurdles to internal development.

Read also: Will Dubai Expo 2020 Have the Economic Impact the UAE Hopes For?